Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Ignore EP queue requests during bus reset
From: Wesley Cheng <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-20 05:31:27
Also in:
lkml
Hi Thinh, On 3/19/2021 7:01 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
Wesley Cheng wrote:quoted
On 3/19/2021 5:40 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:quoted
Hi, Wesley Cheng wrote:quoted
The current dwc3_gadget_reset_interrupt() will stop any active transfers, but only addresses blocking of EP queuing for while we are coming from a disconnected scenario, i.e. after receiving the disconnect event. If the host decides to issue a bus reset on the device, the connected parameter will still be set to true, allowing for EP queuing to continue while we are disabling the functions. To avoid this, set the connected flag to false until the stop active transfers is complete. Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <redacted> --- drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c index 6e14fdc..d5ed0f69 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c@@ -3327,6 +3327,15 @@ static void dwc3_gadget_reset_interrupt(struct dwc3 *dwc) u32 reg; /* + * Ideally, dwc3_reset_gadget() would trigger the function + * drivers to stop any active transfers through ep disable. + * However, for functions which defer ep disable, such as mass + * storage, we will need to rely on the call to stop active + * transfers here, and avoid allowing of request queuing. + */ + dwc->connected = false; + + /* * WORKAROUND: DWC3 revisions <1.88a have an issue which * would cause a missing Disconnect Event if there's a * pending Setup Packet in the FIFO.This doesn't look right. Did you have rebase issue with your local change again? BR, ThinhHi Thinh, This was rebased on Greg's usb-linus branch, which has commit f09ddcfcb8c5 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Prevent EP queuing while stopping transfers") merged.Ah I see.quoted
commit f09ddcfcb8c5 moved the dwc->connected = true to after we have finished stop active transfers. However, this change will also ensure that the connected flag is set to false to ensure that when we call stop active transfers, nothing can prepare TRBs. (previous commit only addresses the case where we get the reset interrupt when coming from a disconnected state)That still doesn't address this issue. Because: 1) We're still protected by the spin_lock_irq*(), so this change doesn't make any difference while handling an event.
Thank you for the feedback. So it is true that we lock dwc->lock while handling EP/device events, but what these changes are trying to address is that during dwc3_stop_active_transfers() we will eventually call dwc3_gadget_giveback() to call the complete() functions registered by the function driver. Before we call the complete() callbacks, we unlock dwc->lock, so we are no longer protected, and if there was a pending ep queue from a function driver, that would allow it to acquire the lock and continue preparing the TRBs.
2) We don't enable the interrupt for END_TRANSFER command completion when doing dwc3_stop_active_transfers(), the DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING flag will not be set to prevent preparing new requests.
Agreed. That is the reason for adding the check to dwc->connected in
__dwc3_gadget_ep_queue()
if (!dep->endpoint.desc || !dwc->pullups_connected || !dwc->connected) {
dev_err(dwc->dev, "%s: can't queue to disabled endpoint\n",
dep->name);
return -ESHUTDOWN;
We should do dwc->connected = true when we handle connection_done interrupt instead. The END_TRANSFER command should complete before this.
So how this change will address the issue is: 1. IRQ handler will acquire dwc->lock 2. dwc3_gadget_reset_handler() sets dwc->connected = false 3. Call to dwc3_stop_active_transfers() ---> dwc3_gadget_giveback() releases dwc->lock 4. If there was a pending ep queue (waiting for dwc->lock) it can continue here 5. __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue() exits early due to dwc->connected = false 6. dwc3_gadget_giveback() re-acquires dwc->lock and continues Thanks Wesley Cheng -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project