Re: [PATCH] usb, xhci, rt2800usb: do not perform Soft Retry
From: Andreas Hartmann <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-22 13:25:43
Also in:
linux-wireless
On 22.01.21 at 12:56 Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:43:42AM +0100, stf_xl@wp.pl wrote:quoted
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl> Since f8f80be501aa ("xhci: Use soft retry to recover faster from transaction errors") on some systems rt2800usb devices are unable to operate. Looks that due to firmware or hardware limitations of those devices, they require full recovery from USB Transaction Errors. To avoid the problem add URB transfer flag, that restore pre f8f80be501aa xhci behaviour when the flag is set. For now only add it only to rt2800usb driver.This feels like a really heavy hammer, to add a xhci flag for a single broken device. Are you sure this is really needed? What does this device do on other operating systems, do they have such a quirk for their host controller driver? Or is this due to the specific host controller device hardware? Should this be a xhci quirk for a specific pci device instead?
Well, rt2800usb USB implementation does have a lot of potential for optimization since the very beginning (current throughput comparison 2 MiB/s vs 13 MiB/s with the original driver e.g.). That's why I'm using until today a self patched version (it's bound to cfg80211 meanwhile) of the original driver (rt5572sta), which doesn't have those problems at all. From my point of view, the goal should be to solve the real reason for the problem. The original driver works much better (leastwise here) and doesn't show this problem at all! But anyway, there is from my point of view a basic problem with xhci_hcd, which just seems not to be completely backward compatible to existing USB 2 drivers (see https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=161130327411612&w=2) if the device is plugged to an USB 3.x interface. Thanks Andreas