[Bug 210351] Wrong setting baudrate for FTDI chip FT230X
From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-08 11:37:55
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210351
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir (svv75@mail.ru) ---Hello, Johan.
Unfortunately, I don't have a device at hand right now. But I remember the
lsusb output was showing FT-X type. And under Windows, all three chips I
mentioned work correctly with all prescalers. I contacted FTDI tech support
with this problem. They advised me to have such a patch for ftdi_sio.c and it
solved the problem. Here's the patch:
static int change_speed (struct tty_struct * tty, struct usb_serial_port *
port)
...
index_value = get_ftdi_divisor (tty, port);
value = (u16) index_value;
index = (u16) (index_value >> 16);
if ((priv-> chip_type == FT2232C) || (priv-> chip_type == FT2232H) ||
(priv-> chip_type == FT4232H) || (priv-> chip_type == FT232H)) {
/ * Probably the BM type needs the MSB of the encoded fractional
* divider also moved like for the chips above. Any infos? * /
index = (u16) ((index << 8) | priv-> interface);
}
So, the high bit of the factional part is lost on the FT-X chips. To fix it in
the kernel try:
if ((priv-> chip_type == FT2232C) || (priv-> chip_type == FT2232H) ||
(priv-> chip_type == FT4232H) || (priv-> chip_type == FT232H) ||
(priv-> chip_type == FTX)) {
/ * Probably the BM type needs the MSB of the encoded fractional
* divider also moved like for the chips above. Any infos? * /
index = (u16) ((index << 8) | priv-> interface);
}
But I don't know why the most significant bit of the prescaler is masked by
something. I have no information about the chip configuration registers. It
looks like this is confidential information. But they could provide it to you
as the driver developer.
Vladimir
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.