Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-01-12 12:06:45
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:57:28PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi, On 1/12/21 12:53 PM, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote:quoted
This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217030632.903718-1-kyletso@google.com (local) and two more patches "Protocol Error handling" and "Respond Wait if...". The patch "AMS and Collision Avoidance" in [v5] is the same as the one in [v4] (only rebased to ToT). The patch "Protocol Error handling" is based on PD3 6.8.1 to fix the wrong handling. The patch "Respond Wait if..." is to fix a conflict when DR/PR/VCONN_SWAP occurs just after the state machine enters Ready State. Kyle Tso (3): usb: typec: tcpm: AMS and Collision Avoidance usb: typec: tcpm: Protocol Error handling usb: typec: tcpm: Respond Wait if VDM state machine is running drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 925 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- include/linux/usb/pd.h | 2 + include/linux/usb/tcpm.h | 4 + 3 files changed, 792 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)Heikki, any thoughts about this series?Note I plan to test this series on a device with a fusb302 Type-C controller, where it broke role-swappings in a previous version of this series. This is supposed to be fixed now but I would like to confirm this. I've had this on my todo list for a while now. I've now put this in my calendar as a task for tomorrow. So please wait till you hear back from me (hopefully with a Tested-by) with merging this, thanks.
No worries, just wanted to make sure it didn't fall through the cracks. thanks for testing! greg k-h