On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:08:13PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:

On Tue 29 Dec 2020 at 23:30, Jack Pham [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Greg and Jerome,

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 04:01:46PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:35:30PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:

quoted

'struct uac_req' purpose is to link 'struct usb_request' to the
corresponding 'struct uac_rtd_params'. However member req is never
used. Using the context of the usb request, we can keep track of the
corresponding 'struct uac_rtd_params' just as well, without allocating
extra memory.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c | 58 ++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

This patch doesn't apply, so I can't apply patches 3 or 4 of this series
:(

Can you rebase against my usb-testing branch and resend?

From the cover letter:

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:35:27PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:

quoted

The series depends on this fix [0] by Jack Pham to apply cleanly

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20201029175949.6052-1-jackp@codeaurora.org/ (local)

My patch hadn't been picked up by Felipe, so it's not in your tree
either, Greg. Should I just resend it to you first?  Or shall I invite
Jerome to just include it in v2 of this series?

Indeed. I rebased on usb-testing and the series applies cleanly with
Jack's changes, as decribed in the cover-letter.

If it is easier, I'm happy to include Jack's change in the v2, along
with the fixed PATCH 2 fixed.

Greg, would it be OK with you ?

That's fine with me.