On 21.02.2018 15:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Andrzej Hajda [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Since extcon property is not allowed in DT, extcon subsystem requires
another way to get extcon device. Lets try the simplest approach - get
edev by of_node.
+/*
+ * extcon_get_edev_by_of_node - Get the extcon device from devicetree.
+ * @node       : OF node identyfying edev
+ *
+ * Return the pointer of extcon device if success or ERR_PTR(err) if fail.
+ */
+struct extcon_dev *extcon_get_edev_by_of_node(struct device_node *node)

First of all, the all other similar cases use "_by_node" in the name.

OK, looks better.

Second, it's not _get_, it's _find_.

The patch splits exisiting extcon_get_edev_by_phandle function into two
functions, nothing more.
Thus it followed naming convention present in extcon framework. I can
switch it of course to _find_.

quoted

+{
+       struct extcon_dev *edev;
+
+       mutex_lock(&extcon_dev_list_lock);
+       list_for_each_entry(edev, &extcon_dev_list, entry)
+               if (edev->dev.parent && edev->dev.parent->of_node == node)
+                       goto out;
+       edev = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+out:
+       mutex_unlock(&extcon_dev_list_lock);
+
+       return edev;

Can't it be done using bus_find_device()?

There is no special extcon bus, so I am not sure. Anyway if it can, it
should be done probably in another patch.

Regards
Andrzej
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html