Re: [RFC PATCH V6 7/7] ovl: implement containerized syncfs for overlayfs
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-22 07:41:12
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 5:01 AM Chengguang Xu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Chengguang Xu <redacted> Now overlayfs can only sync own dirty inodes during syncfs, so remove unnecessary sync_filesystem() on upper file system. Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <redacted> --- fs/overlayfs/super.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c index ccffcd96491d..213b795a6a86 100644 --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c@@ -292,18 +292,14 @@ static int ovl_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait) /* * Not called for sync(2) call or an emergency sync (SB_I_SKIP_SYNC). * All the super blocks will be iterated, including upper_sb. - * - * If this is a syncfs(2) call, then we do need to call - * sync_filesystem() on upper_sb, but enough if we do it when being - * called with wait == 1. */ - if (!wait) - return 0; - upper_sb = ovl_upper_mnt(ofs)->mnt_sb; - down_read(&upper_sb->s_umount); - ret = sync_filesystem(upper_sb); + if (wait) + wait_sb_inodes(upper_sb); + if (upper_sb->s_op->sync_fs) + upper_sb->s_op->sync_fs(upper_sb, wait); + ret = ovl_sync_upper_blockdev(upper_sb, wait);
I think it will be cleaner to use a helper ovl_sync_upper_filesystem() with everything from upper_sb = ... and a comment to explain that this is a variant of __sync_filesystem() where all the dirty inodes write have already been started. Thanks, Amir. P.S. I like this "stoopid proof" v6 because I can understand it ;-)