linux-um archive · January 2005

253 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] FC3/i386 root filesystem on ford (x64_64) with 2.6.4 kernel: cannot setup LDT
  2005-01-31 23:21 · 0 replies this month · William Stearns <hidden>
• STALE7926d [uml-devel] [POLL] Putting UML/2.4 into "fixes-only" mode
  2005-01-30 13:28 · 4 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7926d [uml-devel] PPC port availability?
  2005-01-30 08:28 · 1 reply this month · Juergen Kienhoefer <hidden>
• STALE7926d [uml-devel] 2.6.11-rc1 ...
  2005-01-29 23:34 · 2 replies this month · Gerd Knorr <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch] Make User Mode Linux compile in 2.6.11-rc2-bk6.
  2005-01-29 11:54 · 0 replies this month · Rob Landley <hidden>
• STALE7921d [uml-devel] Re: [POLL] Putting UML/2.4 into "fixes-only" mode
  2005-01-29 05:39 · 0 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7922d [uml-devel] SKAS3: prerelease of V8 (against 2.6.9) uploaded
  2005-01-28 23:37 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7550d [uml-devel] Explaination of system call function flow in TT mode
  2005-01-28 19:11 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7928d [uml-devel] UML remote GUI problems
  2005-01-28 19:11 · 1 reply this month · Greg Furlong <hidden>
• STALE7928d [uml-devel] skas3 patch breaks ATI video drivers
  2005-01-28 15:56 · 8 replies this month · Marcus Better <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [uml-devel] skas3 patch breaks ATI video drivers
  2005-01-28 15:52 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7928d [uml-devel] State of gdkfb ?
  2005-01-28 12:55 · 3 replies this month · Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <hidden>
• STALE7929d [uml-devel] UML running on a SMP host: bug in SKAS3 patch
  2005-01-27 12:34 · 2 replies this month · Bodo Stroesser <hidden>
• STALE7929d [uml-devel] Making sure 2.6.11-rc2-bk* works
  2005-01-27 07:29 · 1 reply this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 1/1] uml: Kconfig_arch little cleanup (to merge before 2.6.11)
  2005-01-27 02:18 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7930d Re: [uml-devel] SIGSEGV and SA_NODEFER
  2005-01-25 23:45 · 7 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7931d [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] keyring syscalls
  2005-01-25 23:02 · 5 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] 2.6.9-bs6 released
  2005-01-25 22:52 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Error in current vsyscall patch
  2005-01-25 22:11 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7931d Fwd: Re: [uml-devel] SIGSEGV and SA_NODEFER
  2005-01-25 11:14 · 1 reply this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7931d RE: [uml-devel] memory
  2005-01-25 02:41 · 4 replies this month · Vaibhav Sharma, Noida <hidden>
• STALE7931d [uml-devel] SIGSEGV and SA_NODEFER
  2005-01-25 02:39 · 9 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7932d [uml-devel] memory
  2005-01-24 18:35 · 7 replies this month · Vaibhav Sharma, Noida <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [uml-devel] memory
  2005-01-24 16:17 · 0 replies this month · Bodo Stroesser <hidden>
• STALE7932d Re: [uml-devel] memory
  2005-01-24 11:32 · 4 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Re: news for uml_hcd driver ?
  2005-01-24 04:08 · 0 replies this month · James McMechan <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] x86_64 compile on 2.6.11-rc2
  2005-01-24 03:35 · 0 replies this month · William Stearns <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [uml-devel] Hellow Dear. I love you.
  2005-01-24 00:14 · 0 replies this month · Peter Hartshorn <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Build errors when compiling 2.6.11-rc2-um
  2005-01-22 08:48 · 0 replies this month · Frank Sorenson <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [uml-devel] SIGSEGV and SA_NODEFER
  2005-01-21 14:33 · 0 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7935d [uml-devel] UML - Is it using swap space?
  2005-01-21 12:06 · 1 reply this month · Gerhard Hannemann <hidden>
• STALE7935d [uml-devel] UML - stalling during large file transfers
  2005-01-21 11:43 · 1 reply this month · Gerhard Hannemann <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] 2.6.11-rc1-mm2 works for me.
  2005-01-21 08:09 · 0 replies this month · Rob Landley <hidden>
• STALE7935d Re: [uml-devel] UML build process uses perl? (With sed alternative.)
  2005-01-21 00:54 · 1 reply this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7936d [uml-devel] question about udp fragmentation under UML
  2005-01-20 22:11 · 2 replies this month · Yari Adán Petralanda <hidden>
• STALE7936d [uml-devel] UML build process uses perl? (With sed alternative.)
  2005-01-20 07:26 · 3 replies this month · Rob Landley <hidden>
• STALE7936d [uml-devel] The PowerPC port is somehow back!
  2005-01-19 23:11 · 1 reply this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] problems with hostfs and large directories - start of diagnosys
  2005-01-19 22:35 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7937d [uml-devel] Progress with -bb4.
  2005-01-19 22:00 · 1 reply this month · Rob Landley <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] UML: skas3 doesn't need to reserve stub-pages
  2005-01-17 16:28 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] UML i386 and x86_64: compare stack pointer to failing address before expanding stack
  2005-01-17 16:27 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7939d Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML fills /tmp irreversibly (2.6.9-bb4 on SuSE 9.2)
  2005-01-17 15:30 · 1 reply this month · Armin M. Warda <hidden>
• STALE7939d Re: [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?
  2005-01-17 02:29 · 1 reply this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?
  2005-01-16 18:40 · 0 replies this month · Rob Landley <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [2.6 patch] (mostly i386) mm cleanup (fwd)
  2005-01-16 02:03 · 0 replies this month · Adrian Bunk <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [patch 051/122] uml: delete unused header umn.h
  2005-01-15 22:49 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7890d [uml-devel] uml_moo
  2005-01-15 10:46 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7941d [uml-devel] About "jiffies" patch
  2005-01-15 02:26 · 1 reply this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [patch 04/11] uml: refuse to run without skas if no tt mode in
  2005-01-14 22:45 · 0 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7942d Re: [patch 04/11] uml: refuse to run without skas if no tt mode in
  2005-01-14 20:06 · 1 reply this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7942d [uml-devel] Anyone running nested UMLs? It seem to work well enough...
  2005-01-14 17:42 · 1 reply this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [patch 02/11] uml: fix compilation for missing headers
  2005-01-14 17:00 · 0 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7942d [uml-devel] 2.6.10-um, /proc/stat is missing information
  2005-01-14 01:08 · 3 replies this month · Christopher S. Aker <hidden>
• STALE7942d [uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix stack corruption
  2005-01-14 00:40 · 5 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7942d [patch 02/11] uml: fix compilation for missing headers
  2005-01-14 00:24 · 1 reply this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 05/11] uml: for ubd cmdline param use colon as delimiter
  2005-01-14 00:08 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 07/11] uml: move code from ubd_user to ubd_kern
  2005-01-13 23:18 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 01/11] uml: Makefile simplification and correction.
  2005-01-13 23:18 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7942d Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 8/8] uml: depend on !USERMODE in drivers/block/Kconfig and drop arch/um/Kconfig_block
  2005-01-13 23:10 · 2 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 06/11] uml: allow free ubd flag ordering
  2005-01-13 22:13 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 08/11] uml: fix and cleanup code in ubd_kern.c coming from ubd_user.c
  2005-01-13 22:13 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 11/11] uml: update ld scripts to newer binutils
  2005-01-13 22:04 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 10/11] uml: add stack addresses to dumps
  2005-01-13 22:04 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 04/11] uml: refuse to run without skas if no tt mode in
  2005-01-13 22:04 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 09/11] uml: add stack content to dumps
  2005-01-13 22:04 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 03/11] uml: fix some UML own initcall macros
  2005-01-13 22:00 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: fix compilation for missing headers
  2005-01-13 20:20 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7943d [uml-devel] Re: Breakage of compilation in .11-rc1 - "code-tidying" is broken
  2005-01-13 20:17 · 1 reply this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Breakage of compilation in .11-rc1 - "code-tidying" is broken
  2005-01-13 19:06 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7943d Re: [patch 8/8] uml: depend on !USERMODE in drivers/block/Kconfig and drop arch/um/Kconfig_block
  2005-01-13 18:58 · 1 reply this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 07/15] uml: fail xterm_open when we have no $DISPLAY
  2005-01-13 15:33 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 2/8] uml: readd CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ for UML
  2005-01-13 15:33 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 7/8] uml: fail xterm_open when we have no $DISPLAY
  2005-01-13 15:33 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 8/8] uml: depend on !USERMODE in drivers/block/Kconfig and drop arch/um/Kconfig_block
  2005-01-13 15:33 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 1/8] uml: avoid NULL dereference in line.c
  2005-01-13 15:33 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 5/8] delete unused header umn.h
  2005-01-13 15:33 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 4/8] uml: drop unused buffer_head.h header from hostfs
  2005-01-13 15:33 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 3/8] uml: Commentary addition to recent SYSEMU fix.
  2005-01-13 15:31 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [patch 6/8] uml: commentary about SIGWINCH handling for consoles
  2005-01-13 15:31 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7943d Re: [uml-devel] df -h and hostfs
  2005-01-13 09:23 · 4 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: [uml-devel] uml_switch query
  2005-01-13 04:39 · 0 replies this month · Adil Mujeeb, Noida <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Fwd: Re: [fuse-devel] Merging?
  2005-01-13 04:21 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7944d [uml-devel] process creep on host FC2, UML 2.4.27
  2005-01-12 20:17 · 1 reply this month · Daniel Nurmi <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Fwd: Re: [uml-user] Exporting kernel symbols.
  2005-01-12 17:51 · 0 replies this month · Blaisorblade <hidden>
• STALE7944d [uml-devel] uml_switch query
  2005-01-12 17:29 · 1 reply this month · Adil Mujeeb, Noida <hidden>
• STALE7944d Re: [uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?
  2005-01-12 17:07 · 1 reply this month · Michael Richardson <hidden>
• STALE7944d [uml-devel] df -h and hostfs
  2005-01-12 15:01 · 2 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] uml_switch query
  2005-01-12 08:57 · 0 replies this month · Adil Mujeeb, Noida <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls
  2005-01-12 02:09 · 0 replies this month · blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls
  2005-01-12 01:45 · 0 replies this month · drepper at redhat dot com <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [Bug 49277] Compile of usermode-sources-2.6.x fails
  2005-01-12 01:24 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [Bug 43616] gcc 3.3.2 cannot link usermode sources (2.4.24-r1 & 2.6.3-r1)
  2005-01-12 01:23 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Your Bugzilla password.
  2005-01-12 01:22 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] [Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls
  2005-01-12 01:21 · 0 replies this month · blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Your Bugzilla password.
  2005-01-12 01:21 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE7944d Re: [uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?
  2005-01-11 23:21 · 1 reply this month · Michael Richardson <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Hang on Reboot
  2005-01-11 19:52 · 0 replies this month · Rus Foster <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [uml-devel] Re: Bug in for-each-cpu-akpm from incrementals
  2005-01-11 18:14 · 0 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [uml-devel] kernel BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:277!
  2005-01-11 16:33 · 0 replies this month · Jeff Dike <hidden>
• STALE7945d Re: [uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?
  2005-01-11 11:27 · 2 replies this month · Michael Richardson <hidden>