From: Jeff Dike <hidden> Date: 2004-10-28 20:27:56
cw@f00f.org said:
the emacs comments are gratuitous and completely pointless, they serve
no useful purpose. fwiw in my .emacs i have:
Yeah, that's why I acked that particular change.
They're not completely pointless, they just cater to an individual's development
environment, and that sort of stuff should be in the environment, and not the
code.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
From: Chris Wedgwood <hidden> Date: 2004-10-28 20:57:24
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 05:32:43PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
They're not completely pointless, they just cater to an individual's
development environment, and that sort of stuff should be in the
environment, and not the code.
unnecessary in the code then, the exception to this perhaps being the
compile-command stuff that was (still is?) in some of the network
drivers as that really is per-file state
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:51, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 05:32:43PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
quoted
They're not completely pointless, they just cater to an individual's
development environment, and that sort of stuff should be in the
environment, and not the code.
unnecessary in the code then, the exception to this perhaps being the
compile-command stuff that was (still is?) in some of the network
drivers as that really is per-file state
??? I don't understand you well. If there are compile-commands for emacs,
they're broken too - using make namefile.o ARCH=um is the kernel universal
solution.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
From: Chris Wedgwood <hidden> Date: 2004-10-29 00:32:57
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 01:44:11AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
??? I don't understand you well. If there are compile-commands for
emacs, they're broken too - using make namefile.o ARCH=um is the
kernel universal solution.
consider a load-able module for uml ... the compile command might be
to build and load the module into a running UML instance... for some
people that's a pretty nice working module where you dont have to
leave your editor to boot/run test things
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
On Thursday 28 October 2004 23:32, Jeff Dike wrote:
cw@f00f.org said:
quoted
the emacs comments are gratuitous and completely pointless, they serve
no useful purpose. fwiw in my .emacs i have:
Yeah, that's why I acked that particular change.
They're not completely pointless, they just cater to an individual's
development environment, and that sort of stuff should be in the
environment, and not the code.
Jeff
Ok. In fact I already agreed, and I was a bit unconfortable with that. However
I'm working on other stuff, so I never worried about that, while seeing you
adding such comments lately. I'm also concerned about not stepping on other
people toes.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel