On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 6:17 PM Paul Moore [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 4:35 PM Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Replace use of the legacy vm_flags_t flags with vma_flags_t values in the
mmap and mprotect LSM hooks of SELinux, AppArmor, IMA and IPE.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
---
security/apparmor/lsm.c | 2 +-
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
security/ipe/hooks.c | 2 +-
security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 +++++++-------
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Similar to the other patchset you just posted, is there any reason why
individual subsystem maintainers can't pick these patches up, or is
there some reason I'm missing and they need to go through a single
tree?
If they can go through multiple trees, can you split this patch up?
AppArmor, Integrity/IMA, IPE, and SELinux are all maintained by
different groups/people.
Since there seems to be a desire to bypass normal procedure in favor
of speed (surely that will never backfire), the SELinux changes look
fine to me, but please do wait to hear from the AppArmor, IMA, and IPE
maintainers before merging this patch.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
--
paul-moore.com