On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 09:18:10 +0100
Vincent Donnefort [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Fixes: 2a872fa4e9c8 ("ring-buffer: Check if memory is available before allocation")
Cc: <redacted>
Reported-by: Michal Suchánek <redacted>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/arYskzbiaNzBR9MD@kunlun.suse.cz/ (local)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/arYskzbiaNzBR9MD@kunlun.suse.cz/ (local)
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <redacted>
It is usually good practice to not use in-reply-to to link the series between
each other.
Correct, the best thing to do is add a link to v2 below:
quoted
---
Changes since v2:
As in:
Changes since v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261016134247.70722-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/ (local)
As versions in threads of previous versions gets messing and confusing. And
in most cases, just dropped entirely.
quoted
- Rebase on top of upstream ring_buffer.c changes from Vincent Donnefort;
update threshold to i < (nr_pages << subbuf_order). (Michal Suchánek)
-- Steve