On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 08:59:10PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Several strlcat() call sites being converted to seq_buf need behavior
seq_buf doesn't currently provide. The return from seq_buf_used() is
not the length of the string in a seq_buf. Once the buffer is full or
has overflowed it returns the buffer size, which counts the byte that
seq_buf_str() replaces with the NUL, so a caller that needs the string
and its length has to call seq_buf_str() and then walk the string with
strlen().
Move the termination out of seq_buf_str() into a helper that returns
where it put the NUL, and add seq_buf_strlen(), which terminates the
buffer in the same way and returns that offset.
As discussed in review, don't add WARN_ON() for seq_buf_strlen() and
drop it from seq_buf_str().
Add tests comparing seq_buf_strlen() against strlen() of seq_buf_str()
for empty, appended, truncated, exactly full, and overflowed buffers,
checking that seq_buf_strlen() alone terminates a full buffer, and
checking that a zero-sized seq_buf reports an empty string from both
accessors without touching the buffer.
Tests passed under qemu on ARCH=x86_64 with GCC 16.2.0 and CONFIG_KASAN=y,
and on big-endian ARCH=s390 with GCC s390x-linux-gnu 16.2.0.
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
static inline const char *seq_buf_str(struct seq_buf *s)
{
- if (WARN_ON(s->size == 0))
+ if (s->size == 0)
return "";
- if (seq_buf_buffer_left(s))
- s->buffer[s->len] = 0;
- else
- s->buffer[s->size - 1] = 0;
+ __seq_buf_terminate(s);
return s->buffer;
}
Looking at this again, can't it be rewritten now using _strlen()?
if (seq_buf_strlen(s))
return s->buffer;
return "";
?
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static inline size_t seq_buf_strlen(struct seq_buf *s)
+{
+ if (s->size == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ return __seq_buf_terminate(s);
+}
(Left for the context to the above.)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko