On 09/07, Gregory Price wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 04:13:31PM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
quoted
--- a/kernel/hung_task.c
+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
@@ -315,13 +315,12 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
return;
this_round_count = 0;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process_thread(g, t) {
+ for_each_process_thread_rculock(g, t) {
if (!max_count--)
- goto unlock;
+ goto out;
... snip ...
quoted
- unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
+out:
if (!this_round_count)
return;
The sunken rcu_read_lock()/unlock() + scoped_guard usage makes this goto
at a minimum very confusing, if not actually broken.
I am afraid I misunderstood you concerns...
This patch renames the "unlock:" label to "out:", and to me this makes sense.
Unfortunately for_each_process_thread() and the new helper can't use "break".
Oleg.