On August 28, 2026 4:24:36 AM EDT, Vincent Donnefort [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 03:33:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:21:39 +0100
Vincent Donnefort [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 07:31:23 +0100
Vincent Donnefort [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Looking at the function again, shouldn't we add !rb_is_static(cpu_buffer) as
well to the full page test?
Why?
-- Steve
So that the splice can make progress when the ring-buffer is presistent or
user-mapped. Or do we say that's expected behaviour?
Ah yeah, I see. Hmm, looking at the code to see how this would work, I
think I found another bug. Let me look deeper into it.
-- Steve
A bug if we allow rb_is_static()?
No, something else.
If not, shall I add it to my series?
Yeah, go ahead and update it.
Thanks,
-- Steve