Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Prevent subbuf order change when resizing is disabled
From: Vincent Donnefort <hidden>
Date: 2026-08-05 19:15:22
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:36:51PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 04:32:24PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:quoted
Because ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() frees buffer pages, we can't allow it when risizing is disabled. A non-consuming reader is at risk of use-after-free (rb_advance_iter()). Return -EBUSY on resize_disabled, matching ring_buffer_resize() behaviour. Fixes: f9b94daa542a ("ring-buffer: Set new size of the ring buffer sub page") Reported-by: syzbot+e0cc44465d6bae735679@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <redacted>diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c index 8e2485bb3aa8..414bca2121a7 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c@@ -7358,7 +7358,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order) cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu]; - if (cpu_buffer->mapped) { + if (atomic_read(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled)) {Ha, my bad I forgot that mapped is not just "user-space mapped" but also "range-mapped". However probably the best is just to record_disable range mapped buffers in rb_allocate_cpu_buffer()... especially ring_buffer_resize() doesn't use cpu_buffer->mapped
I am also looking at the other findings from Sashiko. I believe some are legit.
quoted
err = -EBUSY; goto error; } base-commit: 075b74841bd0065a3bda3440873c747938e69b68 -- 2.55.0.571.g244d577d93-goog-- Vincent
-- Vincent