Thread (38 messages) read the whole thread 38 messages, 7 authors, 1d ago

Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] mm: introduce hw_pte_t for PTE table storage

From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2026-07-31 06:59:45
Also in: bpf, damon, dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-arch, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-perf-users, lkml, xen-devel

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 08:53:46AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 31.07.26 07:49, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 05:46:52PM +0100, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
quoted
pte_t is used both for logical PTE values and for entries stored in a PTE
table, so pte_t * does not distinguish a pointer to a copied value from a
pointer to table storage.
Should we rather call them as "Linux PTE" and "HW PTE" instead ?
What about "SW PTE"?
Both Linux PTE or SW PTE would be better than current Logical PTE description.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help