Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/compaction: skip isolate mlocked folios when compact_unevictable_allowed=0
From: Wandun <hidden>
Date: 2026-07-08 01:31:25
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-rt-devel, lkml
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
On 6/29/26 17:07, Wandun wrote:
On 6/26/26 21:42, Alexander Krabler wrote:quoted
On 6/26/26 11:38, Wandun wrote:quoted
On 6/26/26 16:45, Alexander Krabler wrote:quoted
However, we were not able to reproduce the actual race (mlockall() process waiting on a migration PTE), not in the past, not now. Might be hard to trigger that race.Not hard to trigger that case, I added a debug message, such as below, lots of messages occur in a few second. diff --cc mm/memory.c index ff338c2abe92,ff338c2abe92..6552b3b14f78--- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c@@@ -4768,6 -4768,6 +4768,8 @@@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_faul if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) { migration_entry_wait(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address); + if (!strcmp(current->comm, "repro")) + pr_err("============== hit ================\n"); } else if (softleaf_is_device_exclusive(entry)) { vmf->page = softleaf_to_page(entry); ret = remove_device_exclusive_entry(vmf);I have a kprobe on migration_entry_wait set and logged into a ftrace buffer (including kernel stacktrace). Yes, this function is hit, but only inside the mmap-syscall, which is okay, memory allocation is not realtime-safe. repro-2090 [002] d.... 811.129549: frt_migration_entry_wait: (migration_entry_wait+0x0/0x100) repro-2090 [002] d.... 811.129553: <stack trace> => migration_entry_wait => __handle_mm_fault => handle_mm_fault => __get_user_pages => populate_vma_page_range => __mm_populate => vm_mmap_pgoff => ksys_mmap_pgoff => __arm64_sys_mmap => el0_svc_common.constprop.0 => do_el0_svc => el0_svc => el0t_64_sync_handler => el0t_64_sync The original race was an instruction abort interrupt out of nothing due to the migration PTE set by kcompactd. And these kind of races I see quite often on non mlockall()-processes, but can't reproduce on memory locked processes. Example: podman-832 [000] d.... 812.447820: frt_migration_entry_wait: (migration_entry_wait+0x0/0x100) podman-832 [000] d.... 812.447823: <stack trace> => migration_entry_wait => __handle_mm_fault => handle_mm_fault => do_page_fault => do_translation_fault => do_mem_abort => el0_da => el0t_64_sync_handler => el0t_64_syncHi, Alexander From the perspective of the root cause, there is no fundamental difference between these two call stacks. I modified the reproduction program, and it can still reproduce the situation of the second call stack (although it doesn't occur as frequently). The complete reproduction program is as follows: #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <fcntl.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <sys/sysinfo.h> #include <unistd.h> #define PAGE_SIZE 4096 #define NR_PAGES 10000 static void *worker_fn(void *arg) { int fd = (long)arg; size_t len = NR_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE; while (1) { if (ftruncate(fd, 0) < 0) {} if (ftruncate(fd, len) < 0) {} char *p = mmap(NULL, len, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); if (p == MAP_FAILED) continue; mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT | MCL_FUTURE); for (int i = 0; i < NR_PAGES; i++) { for (int j = 0; j < PAGE_SIZE; j++) { p[i * PAGE_SIZE + j] = 1; } } usleep(200); munmap(p, len); } return NULL; } static void *compact_fn(void *arg) { (void)arg; int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/compact_memory", O_WRONLY); if (fd < 0) return NULL; while (1) { if (write(fd, "1", 1) < 0) {} usleep(5000); } } int main(void) { int nproc = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN); if (nproc < 1) nproc = 1; int *fds = calloc((size_t)nproc, sizeof(int)); if (!fds) return 1; size_t len = NR_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE; for (int i = 0; i < nproc; i++) { char path[64]; snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "./repro_%d.dat", i); unlink(path); fds[i] = open(path, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0600); if (fds[i] < 0) return 1; if (ftruncate(fds[i], len) < 0) return 1; } printf("repro: %d workers, %d pages, Ctrl-C to stop\n", nproc, NR_PAGES); pthread_t compact; pthread_create(&compact, NULL, compact_fn, NULL); pthread_t *threads = calloc((size_t)nproc, sizeof(pthread_t)); for (int i = 0; i < nproc; i++) pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, worker_fn, (void *)(long)fds[i]); pthread_join(compact, NULL); return 0; }
I found there are false positives in this reproducer. I modified the program a little, the diff is as follows, the problem can still be reproduced
diff --git a/repro.c b/repro.c
index b1b34d5..59cb417 100644
--- a/repro.c
+++ b/repro.c@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ static void *worker_fn(void *arg) int fd = (long)arg; size_t len = NR_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE; + mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT | MCL_FUTURE | MCL_CURRENT); while (1) { if (ftruncate(fd, 0) < 0) {} if (ftruncate(fd, len) < 0) {}
@@ -24,8 +25,6 @@ static void *worker_fn(void *arg) if (p == MAP_FAILED) continue; - mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT | MCL_FUTURE); - for (int i = 0; i < NR_PAGES; i++) { for (int j = 0; j < PAGE_SIZE; j++) { p[i * PAGE_SIZE + j] = 1;
quoted
Thanks, Alexander -- KUKA Deutschland GmbH Board of Directors: Michael Jürgens (Chairman), Johan Naten, Hui Zhang Registered Office: Augsburg HRB 14914 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of contents of this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.