Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 1 author, 29d ago

Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] tracing/events: Fix to check the simple_tsk_fn creation

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-06-19 08:33:06
Also in: linux-doc, linux-kselftest, lkml

Let me pick this fix to probes/core.

Thanks,

On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:02:53 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Sashiko pointed that this sample code does not correctly handle the
failure of thread creation because kthread_run() can return -errno.

Check the simple_tsk_fn is correctly initialized (created) or not.

Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178092865666.163648.10457567771536160909.stgit%40devnote2

Fixes: 9cfe06f8cd5c ("tracing/events: add trace-events-sample")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 Changes in v4:
   - Fix to remove decrementing counter in error path, since foo_bar_reg() always returns 0.
   - Add a newline to error message.
 Changes in v3:
   - Recover the usage counter.
---
 samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
index ecc7db237f2e..0b7a6efdb247 100644
--- a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
+++ b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
@@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ int foo_bar_reg(void)
 	 * for consistency sake, we still take the thread_mutex.
 	 */
 	simple_tsk_fn = kthread_run(simple_thread_fn, NULL, "event-sample-fn");
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(simple_tsk_fn)) {
+		pr_err("Failed to create simple_thread_fn\n");
+		simple_tsk_fn = NULL;
+	}
  out:
 	mutex_unlock(&thread_mutex);
 	return 0;

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help