On Tue, 26 May 2026 14:17:46 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2026 13:08:57 -0400
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This is to make the persistent ring buffer more robust when sub-buffers
are detected to be corrupted. Instead of invalidating the entire buffer,
just invalidate the individual sub-buffers.

I started with Masami's patches and modified some from Sashiko reviews.
I added a few patches to display the dropped events when the persistent
ring buffers validation checks found sub-buffers were dropped due to being
corrupted data.  

It seems that Sashiko still marks it "Incompleted".
Maybe we need base-commit: tag in this cover mail?
I also guess that this series does not use "In-Reply-To:" but
only uses "References:" tag in the mail header. I guess
Sashiko's mail header parser missed it.

But this applies to mainline. I'm not sure why it's having problems.

-- Steve