On Fri,  9 Jan 2026 19:54:11 +0800
Xiang Gao [off-list ref] wrote:

From: gaoxiang17 <redacted>

Since we can only inspect dmabuf by iterating over process FDs or the
dmabuf_list, we need to add our own tracepoints to track its status in
real time in production.

For example:
   binder:3016_1-3102    [006] ...1.   255.126521: dma_buf_export: exp_name=qcom,system size=12685312 ino=2738
   binder:3016_1-3102    [006] ...1.   255.126528: dma_buf_fd: exp_name=qcom,system size=12685312 ino=2738 fd=8
   binder:3016_1-3102    [006] ...1.   255.126642: dma_buf_mmap_internal: exp_name=qcom,system size=28672 ino=2739
     kworker/6:1-86      [006] ...1.   255.127194: dma_buf_put: exp_name=qcom,system size=12685312 ino=2738
    RenderThread-9293    [006] ...1.   316.618179: dma_buf_get: exp_name=qcom,system size=12771328 ino=2762 fd=176
    RenderThread-9293    [006] ...1.   316.618195: dma_buf_dynamic_attach: exp_name=qcom,system size=12771328 ino=2762 attachment:ffffff880a18dd00 is_dynamic=0 dev_name=kgsl-3d0
    RenderThread-9293    [006] ...1.   318.878220: dma_buf_detach: exp_name=qcom,system size=12771328 ino=2762 attachment:ffffff880a18dd00 is_dynamic=0 dev_name=kgsl-3d0

Signed-off-by: Xiang Gao <redacted>

This may already been accepted but just for the record. For the tracing POV:

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve