[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-5.10] ring-buffer: Avoid softlockup in ring_buffer_resize() during memory free
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-01-12 14:59:09
Also in:
linux-patches, lkml, stable
Subsystem:
the rest, tracing · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu
From: Wupeng Ma <redacted>
[ Upstream commit 6435ffd6c7fcba330dfa91c58dc30aed2df3d0bf ]
When user resize all trace ring buffer through file 'buffer_size_kb',
then in ring_buffer_resize(), kernel allocates buffer pages for each
cpu in a loop.
If the kernel preemption model is PREEMPT_NONE and there are many cpus
and there are many buffer pages to be freed, it may not give up cpu
for a long time and finally cause a softlockup.
To avoid it, call cond_resched() after each cpu buffer free as Commit
f6bd2c92488c ("ring-buffer: Avoid softlockup in ring_buffer_resize()")
does.
Detailed call trace as follow:
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
rcu: 24-....: (14837 ticks this GP) idle=521c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=230597/230597 fqs=5329
rcu: (t=15004 jiffies g=26003221 q=211022 ncpus=96)
CPU: 24 UID: 0 PID: 11253 Comm: bash Kdump: loaded Tainted: G EL 6.18.2+ #278 NONE
pc : arch_local_irq_restore+0x8/0x20
arch_local_irq_restore+0x8/0x20 (P)
free_frozen_page_commit+0x28c/0x3b0
__free_frozen_pages+0x1c0/0x678
___free_pages+0xc0/0xe0
free_pages+0x3c/0x50
ring_buffer_resize.part.0+0x6a8/0x880
ring_buffer_resize+0x3c/0x58
__tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x34/0xd8
tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x8c/0xd0
tracing_entries_write+0x74/0xd8
vfs_write+0xcc/0x288
ksys_write+0x74/0x118
__arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x38
Cc: <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251228065008.2396573-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Wupeng Ma <redacted>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
LLM Generated explanations, may be completely bogus:
## Analysis of Commit: ring-buffer: Avoid softlockup in
ring_buffer_resize() during memory free
### 1. COMMIT MESSAGE ANALYSIS
The commit message clearly describes:
- **Problem**: When resizing trace ring buffers on systems with many
CPUs and PREEMPT_NONE, the kernel can hold the CPU for too long while
freeing buffer pages, causing a softlockup (RCU stall)
- **Evidence**: Includes a complete stack trace showing the issue on a
96-CPU system with kernel 6.18.2+
- **Solution**: Add `cond_resched()` after each buffer page free,
matching what was done in commit f6bd2c92488c for a different code
path
- **Validation**: Acked by Masami Hiramatsu and signed off by Steven
Rostedt (the ring buffer subsystem maintainer)
Keywords present: "softlockup", "self-detected stall", "rcu_sched" - all
indicate a real, user-visible bug.
### 2. CODE CHANGE ANALYSIS
The change is minimal and surgical:
list_for_each_entry_safe(bpage, tmp, &cpu_buffer->new_pages, list) {
list_del_init(&bpage->list);
free_buffer_page(bpage);
+
+ cond_resched();
}
This is in the `out_err:` error handling path of `ring_buffer_resize()`. The loop iterates over all buffer pages to free them on error cleanup. On systems with many CPUs and many pages, this loop can run for a very long time without yielding. **Technical mechanism**: - `cond_resched()` checks if the scheduler needs to preempt the current task - On PREEMPT_NONE kernels, voluntary preemption points like this are the only way to yield - This is a standard, well-established kernel pattern for long-running loops ### 3. CLASSIFICATION - **Bug type**: Softlockup fix - prevents RCU stalls and potential watchdog timeouts - **Not a feature**: Does not add new functionality, just prevents a hang - **Not an exception category**: Standard bug fix, not device ID/quirk/DT ### 4. SCOPE AND RISK ASSESSMENT | Metric | Assessment | |--------|------------| | Lines changed | 2 (1 blank + 1 cond_resched) | | Files touched | 1 | | Complexity | Trivial | | Risk | Very Low | **Risk is minimal because**: - `cond_resched()` is designed to be safe to call anywhere - It's a no-op when no rescheduling is needed - The same pattern already exists in this function (per the referenced commit) - Only affects the error path during cleanup ### 5. USER IMPACT - **Affected users**: Systems with many CPUs, PREEMPT_NONE configuration, using tracing - **Severity**: High - softlockups can trigger watchdog resets and system hangs - **Trigger**: User-initiated action (writing to buffer_size_kb file) - **Real-world**: Stack trace demonstrates this was hit on production hardware (96-CPU ARM64 system) This is particularly relevant for enterprise servers and embedded systems which commonly use PREEMPT_NONE for performance. ### 6. STABILITY INDICATORS - **Reviewed by maintainer**: Steven Rostedt (ring buffer maintainer) signed off - **Acked by**: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) - experienced kernel tracing developer - **Follows established pattern**: References commit f6bd2c92488c which applied the same fix elsewhere ### 7. DEPENDENCY CHECK - The `ring_buffer_resize()` function and its error path have existed for years - `cond_resched()` is a fundamental kernel API available in all stable trees - No dependencies on new code or recent changes - The fix is self-contained and independent ### CONCLUSION This commit is an **ideal stable backport candidate**: 1. **Obviously correct**: Adding `cond_resched()` to prevent softlockups is a textbook kernel pattern 2. **Fixes a real bug**: Softlockups are serious user-visible issues that can hang systems 3. **Small and contained**: 2-line change, single file, trivial complexity 4. **No new features**: Pure bug fix with no behavioral changes 5. **No API changes**: No userspace-visible modifications 6. **Very low risk**: `cond_resched()` is designed to be safe; worst case is slightly increased latency 7. **Maintainer approved**: Signed off by the subsystem maintainer 8. **Affects all stable trees**: The vulnerable code path exists in all supported stable kernels The fix follows the exact pattern already applied in the same function by a previous commit, demonstrating it's a proven solution. The risk-to- benefit ratio is excellent: near-zero risk for fixing a potentially system-hanging bug. **YES** kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index afcd3747264d2..3ba08fc1b7d05 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c@@ -3121,6 +3121,8 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size, list) { list_del_init(&bpage->list); free_buffer_page(bpage); + + cond_resched(); } } out_err_unlock:
--
2.51.0