Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Disable branch profiling for all arm64 code
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: 2026-01-06 15:46:09
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml, stable
On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 03:31:16PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 06:05:37AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 12:21:47PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 02:16:35AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:quoted
The arm64 kernel doesn't boot with annotated branches (PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES) enabled and CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL together. Bisecting it, I found that disabling branch profiling in arch/arm64/mm solved the problem. Narrowing down a bit further, I found that physaddr.c is the file that needs to have branch profiling disabled to get the machine to boot. I suspect that it might invoke some ftrace helper very early in the boot process and ftrace is still not enabled(!?). Rather than playing whack-a-mole with individual files, disable branch profiling for the entire arch/arm64 tree, similar to what x86 already does in arch/x86/Kbuild. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ec6d06efb0bac ("arm64: Add support for CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL") Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>I don't think ec6d06efb0bac is to blame here, and CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is unsound in a number of places, so I'd prefer to remove that Fixes tag and backport this for all stable trees.That is fair, thanks for the review. Should I submit a new version without the fixes tag, or, do you guys do it while merging the patch?I assume that Catalin or Will can handle that when applying (if they agree with me); no need to respin.
Thanks Mark.