Re: [PATCH v10] dma-buf: add some tracepoints to debug.
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2025-12-24 14:29:21
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-media, lkml
On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 09:34:55 +0800 Xiang Gao [off-list ref] wrote:
From: gaoxiang17 <redacted>
Since we can only inspect dmabuf by iterating over process FDs or the
dmabuf_list, we need to add our own tracepoints to track its status in
real time in production.
For example:
binder:3016_1-3102 [006] ...1. 255.126521: dma_buf_export: exp_name=qcom,system size=12685312 ino=2738
binder:3016_1-3102 [006] ...1. 255.126528: dma_buf_fd: exp_name=qcom,system size=12685312 ino=2738 fd=8
binder:3016_1-3102 [006] ...1. 255.126642: dma_buf_mmap_internal: exp_name=qcom,system size=28672 ino=2739
kworker/6:1-86 [006] ...1. 255.127194: dma_buf_put: exp_name=qcom,system size=12685312 ino=2738
RenderThread-9293 [006] ...1. 316.618179: dma_buf_get: exp_name=qcom,system size=12771328 ino=2762 fd=176
RenderThread-9293 [006] ...1. 316.618195: dma_buf_dynamic_attach: exp_name=qcom,system size=12771328 ino=2762 attachment:ffffff880a18dd00 is_dynamic=0 dev_name=kgsl-3d0
RenderThread-9293 [006] ...1. 318.878220: dma_buf_detach: exp_name=qcom,system size=12771328 ino=2762 attachment:ffffff880a18dd00 is_dynamic=0 dev_name=kgsl-3d0
Signed-off-by: Xiang Gao <redacted>
---BTW, it's sometimes nice to have in new versions of a patch with a list of changes below the above "---" (here): Changes since v9: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251223032749.1371913-1-gxxa03070307@gmail.com/ (local) - <list changes here> That way it keeps a nice history of all the versions of the patch. No need to resend. Just giving you some advice for future patches.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 49 +++++++++- include/trace/events/dma_buf.h | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/trace/events/dma_buf.hdiff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c index edaa9e4ee4ae..5e6f65cd0306 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c@@ -35,6 +35,26 @@ #include "dma-buf-sysfs-stats.h" +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS +#include <trace/events/dma_buf.h> + +/* + * dmabuf->name must be accessed with holding dmabuf->name_lock. + * we need to take the lock around the tracepoint call itself where + * it is called in the code. + * + * Note: FUNC##_enabled() is a static branch that will only + * be set when the trace event is enabled. + */ +#define DMA_BUF_TRACE(FUNC, ...) \ + do { \ + /* Always expose lock if lockdep is enabled */ \ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) || FUNC##_enabled()) { \ + guard(spinlock)(&dmabuf->name_lock); \ + FUNC(__VA_ARGS__); \ + } \ + } while (0)
I'm curious. Are the above backslashes lined up nicely in the code?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ static inline int is_dma_buf_file(struct file *); static DEFINE_MUTEX(dmabuf_list_mutex);@@ -220,6 +240,8 @@ static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma) dmabuf->size >> PAGE_SHIFT) return -EINVAL; + DMA_BUF_TRACE(trace_dma_buf_mmap_internal, dmabuf); + return dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma); }@@ -745,6 +767,8 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct dma_buf_export_info *exp_info) __dma_buf_list_add(dmabuf); + DMA_BUF_TRACE(trace_dma_buf_export, dmabuf); + return dmabuf; err_dmabuf:@@ -768,10 +792,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_export, "DMA_BUF"); */ int dma_buf_fd(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, int flags) { + int fd; + if (!dmabuf || !dmabuf->file) return -EINVAL; - return FD_ADD(flags, dmabuf->file); + fd = FD_ADD(flags, dmabuf->file); + if (fd >= 0) + DMA_BUF_TRACE(trace_dma_buf_fd, dmabuf, fd);
Instead of adding the above if statement in the code, you can make the event conditional (See below). Then this could just be: - return FD_ADD(flags, dmabuf->file); + fd = FD_ADD(flags, dmabuf->file); + DMA_BUF_TRACE(trace_dma_buf_fd, dmabuf, fd); And not have the condition hit when tracing isn't enabled.
+ + return fd; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_fd, "DMA_BUF");
[..]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/trace/events/dma_buf.h b/include/trace/events/dma_buf.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..2c9ba8533467 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/trace/events/dma_buf.h@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM +#define TRACE_SYSTEM dma_buf + +#if !defined(_TRACE_DMA_BUF_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) +#define _TRACE_DMA_BUF_H + +#include <linux/dma-buf.h> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h> + +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(dma_buf, + + TP_PROTO(struct dma_buf *dmabuf), + + TP_ARGS(dmabuf), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __string( exp_name, dmabuf->exp_name) + __field( size_t, size) + __field( ino_t, ino) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __assign_str(exp_name); + __entry->size = dmabuf->size; + __entry->ino = dmabuf->file->f_inode->i_ino; + ), + + TP_printk("exp_name=%s size=%zu ino=%lu", + __get_str(exp_name), + __entry->size, + __entry->ino) +); + +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(dma_buf_attach_dev, + + TP_PROTO(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, + bool is_dynamic, struct device *dev), + + TP_ARGS(dmabuf, attach, is_dynamic, dev), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __string( dev_name, dev_name(dev)) + __string( exp_name, dmabuf->exp_name) + __field( size_t, size) + __field( ino_t, ino) + __field( struct dma_buf_attachment *, attach) + __field( bool, is_dynamic) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __assign_str(dev_name); + __assign_str(exp_name); + __entry->size = dmabuf->size; + __entry->ino = dmabuf->file->f_inode->i_ino; + __entry->is_dynamic = is_dynamic; + __entry->attach = attach; + ), + + TP_printk("exp_name=%s size=%zu ino=%lu attachment:%p is_dynamic=%d dev_name=%s", + __get_str(exp_name), + __entry->size, + __entry->ino, + __entry->attach, + __entry->is_dynamic, + __get_str(dev_name)) +); + +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(dma_buf_fd, + + TP_PROTO(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, int fd), + + TP_ARGS(dmabuf, fd), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __string( exp_name, dmabuf->exp_name) + __field( size_t, size) + __field( ino_t, ino) + __field( int, fd) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __assign_str(exp_name); + __entry->size = dmabuf->size; + __entry->ino = dmabuf->file->f_inode->i_ino; + __entry->fd = fd; + ), + + TP_printk("exp_name=%s size=%zu ino=%lu fd=%d", + __get_str(exp_name), + __entry->size, + __entry->ino, + __entry->fd) +); +
[..]
+DEFINE_EVENT(dma_buf_fd, dma_buf_fd, + + TP_PROTO(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, int fd), + + TP_ARGS(dmabuf, fd) +);
If fd needs to be greater or equal to zero, you can make the above: DEFINE_EVENT_CONDITION(dma_buf_fd, dma_buf_fd, TP_PROTO(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, int fd), TP_ARGS(dmabuf, fd), TP_CONDITION(fd >= 0) ); This places the "fd >= 0" into the code that is called when the tracepoint is enabled. If the condition isn't met, then the tracepoint doesn't get recorded. -- Steve
+ +DEFINE_EVENT(dma_buf_fd, dma_buf_get, + + TP_PROTO(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, int fd), + + TP_ARGS(dmabuf, fd) +); + +#endif /* _TRACE_DMA_BUF_H */ + +/* This part must be outside protection */ +#include <trace/define_trace.h>