On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:52:18 -0800 SeongJae Park [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 17:48:51 -0500 Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:01:25 -0800
SeongJae Park [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+ TP_printk("ctx_idx=%u scheme_idx=%u nr_tried=%lu sz_tried=%lu "
+ "nr_applied=%lu sz_tried=%lu sz_ops_filter_passed=%lu "
+ "qt_exceeds=%lu nr_snapshots=%lu",
Nit, but it's been stated that strings should not be broken up because of
the column limit.
screw the rules
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/include/trace/events/damon.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/damon.h
@@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(damos_stat_after_apply_interval,
__entry->nr_snapshots = stat->nr_snapshots;
),
- TP_printk("ctx_idx=%u scheme_idx=%u nr_tried=%lu sz_tried=%lu "
- "nr_applied=%lu sz_tried=%lu sz_ops_filter_passed=%lu "
- "qt_exceeds=%lu nr_snapshots=%lu",
+ TP_printk("ctx_idx=%u scheme_idx=%u nr_tried=%lu sz_tried=%lu nr_applied=%lu sz_tried=%lu sz_ops_filter_passed=%lu qt_exceeds=%lu nr_snapshots=%lu",
__entry->context_idx, __entry->scheme_idx,
__entry->nr_tried, __entry->sz_tried,
__entry->nr_applied, __entry->sz_applied,
because that's just crazy. Let's use some judgment here!