Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member | linux-trace-kernel | Ratatoskr

[PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2025-11-26
Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2025-11-26
Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> · 2025-11-27
Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2025-11-28
Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> · 2025-11-28
Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2025-11-28
Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2025-11-28
Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2025-11-28

Re: [PATCH] overflow: Introduce struct_offset() to get offset of member

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2025-11-28 03:27:20
Also in: linux-hardening, lkml

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:00:01 -0800
Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:

I'd rather it keep the same API style as struct_size() if it's going to share the naming style.

Fair enough. Then I won't change it.

If you have an instance and not a pointer, just slap on a & :)

:-p

I guess that would work. Although it will kinda look a bit strange.
At least to me.

-- Steve