Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO

[RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Add PG_atomic · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Add PG_atomic · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> · 2025-11-12
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Add PG_atomic · "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org> · 2025-11-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Add PG_atomic · Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> · 2025-11-14
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Add PG_atomic · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> · 2025-11-14
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Add PG_atomic · Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> · 2025-11-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm: Add PG_atomic · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2025-11-18
[RFC PATCH 1/8] fs: Rename STATX{_ATTR}_WRITE_ATOMIC -> STATX{_ATTR}_WRITE_ATOMIC_DIO · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[RFC PATCH 3/8] fs: Add initial buffered atomic write support info to statx · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[RFC PATCH 4/8] iomap: buffered atomic write support · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[RFC PATCH 5/8] iomap: pin pages for RWF_ATOMIC buffered write · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[RFC PATCH 6/8] xfs: Report atomic write min and max for buf io as well · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[RFC PATCH 8/8] xfs: Lift the bs == ps restriction for HW buffered atomic writes · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[RFC PATCH 7/8] iomap: Add bs<ps buffered atomic writes support · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-12
[syzbot ci] Re: xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · syzbot ci <hidden> · 2025-11-12
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2025-11-12
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2025-11-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> · 2025-11-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2025-11-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2025-11-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-14
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> · 2025-11-14
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2025-11-16
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> · 2025-11-17
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2025-11-17
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-20
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO · Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-11-20

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2025-11-14 13:18:18
Also in: linux-block, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-xfs, lkml

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:50:25PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:

buffered IO. Further, many DBs support both direct IO and buffered IO
well and it may not be fair to force them to stick to direct IO to get
the benefits of atomic writes.

It may not be fair to force kernel developers to support a feature that
has no users.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help