Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 2 authors, 2025-10-21
STALE342d REVIEWED: 11 (11M)

Revision v4 of 2 in this series; 2 review trailers.

Revisions (2)
  1. v4 current
  2. v5 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v4 04/16] blktrace: untangle if/else sequence in __blk_add_trace

From: Johannes Thumshirn <hidden>
Date: 2025-10-20 13:41:48
Also in: linux-block, lkml
Subsystem: block layer, the rest, tracing · Maintainers: Jens Axboe, Linus Torvalds, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu

Untangle the if/else sequence setting the trace action in
__blk_add_trace() and turn it into a switch statement for better
extensibility.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <redacted>
---
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 51745832c713..11e264f67851 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -278,10 +278,19 @@ static void __blk_add_trace(struct blk_trace *bt, sector_t sector, int bytes,
 	what |= MASK_TC_BIT(opf, META);
 	what |= MASK_TC_BIT(opf, PREFLUSH);
 	what |= MASK_TC_BIT(opf, FUA);
-	if (op == REQ_OP_DISCARD || op == REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE)
+
+	switch (op) {
+	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
+	case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
 		what |= BLK_TC_ACT(BLK_TC_DISCARD);
-	if (op == REQ_OP_FLUSH)
+		break;
+	case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
 		what |= BLK_TC_ACT(BLK_TC_FLUSH);
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
 	if (cgid)
 		what |= __BLK_TA_CGROUP;
 
-- 
2.51.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help