Re: [BUG] Failed to obtain stack trace via bpf_get_stackid on ARM64 architecture
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-09-24 21:56:47
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 17:42:18 +0200 Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 02:25:36PM +0800, Feng Yang wrote: SNIPquoted
quoted
Hmm, can you also dump the regs and insert pr_info() to find which function fails? Thanks,After testing, it was found that the stack could not be obtained because user_mode(regs) returned 1. Referring to the arch_ftrace_fill_perf_regs function in your email (https://lore.kernel.org/all/173518997908.391279.15910334347345106424.stgit@devnote2/ (local)), I made the following modification: by setting the value of pstate, the stack can now be obtained successfully.diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h index 058a99aa44bd..f2814175e958 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h@@ -159,11 +159,13 @@ ftrace_partial_regs(const struct ftrace_regs *fregs, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct __arch_ftrace_regs *afregs = arch_ftrace_regs(fregs); memcpy(regs->regs, afregs->regs, sizeof(afregs->regs)); regs->sp = afregs->sp; regs->pc = afregs->pc; regs->regs[29] = afregs->fp; regs->regs[30] = afregs->lr; + regs->pstate = PSR_MODE_EL1h; return regs; }However, I'm not sure if there will be any other impacts...nice, the test works for me with this change.. could you please send formal patch? I can polish and send out the test [1]
Yeah, and Cc to arm64 maintainers, also Closes: to this thread. Thanks,
thanks, jirka [1] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/9845/commits/11b31cd465a83b8719cb06331c8e81794cca40fa
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]