On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:48 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:05:59AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:42 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 04:18:03PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 02:28:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

quoted

Hi,

These are cleanups and fixes that I applied on top of Jiri's patches:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250720112133.244369-1-jolsa@kernel.org

The combined lot sits in:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core

Jiri was going to send me some selftest updates that might mean rebasing that
tree, but we'll see. If this all works we'll land it in -tip.

hi,
sent the selftest fix in here:
  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250821141557.13233-1-jolsa@kernel.org/T/#u (local)

Andrii,
do we want any special logistic for the bpf/selftest changes or it could
go through the tip tree?

let's route selftest changes through tip together with the rest of
uprobe changes, it's unlikely to conflict

fyi, there's conflict now between tip/perf/core and bpf-next/master
in the selftests.. due to usdt SIB argument support changes

please let me know if you need any help in resolving that

so selftest change hasn't landed in tip/perf/core just yet, is that
right? If there is a conflict, I guess that changes equation a bit.
I'd land it in bpf-next and for now disable that test in BPF CI until
the trees converge. WDYT?

jirka