On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 11:31:12AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2025 03:31:31 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
by applying the patch, the issue gone. but since you said this is a 'diagnostic
patch', not sure if it's a real fix. anyway:
Tested-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Thank you very much! This tells me that something on the code path from
the tracepoint to the BPF program needs to have preemption disabled.
I will leave the diagnostic patch in my tree, and will be looking into
what the real fix should be.
Was it a BPF program that triggered this? I couldn't get that from the
backtrace. Also, is this only a x86 32bit issue?
Excellent question, now that you mention it! Your thought is that
one of the other preemption-disablings might need to be moved?
Thanx, Paul