Re: [PATCH v10 08/14] unwind deferred: Use bitmask to determine which callbacks to call
- From
- Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
- Date
- 2025-06-24 15:00:34
- Also in
- bpf, lkml
- Reply to
- Steven Rostedt, 2025-06-24
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:55:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
Which is somewhat inconsistent; __clear_bit()/__set_bit()Hmm, are the above non-atomic?
Yes, ctags or any other code browser of you choice should get you to
their definition, which has a comment explaining the non-atomicy of
them.