On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 08:54:24PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/kernel/unwind/user.c b/kernel/unwind/user.c
index 4fc550356b33..29e1f497a26e 100644
--- a/kernel/unwind/user.c
+++ b/kernel/unwind/user.c
@@ -12,12 +12,32 @@ static struct unwind_user_frame fp_frame = {
ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_FRAME
};
+static struct unwind_user_frame compat_fp_frame = {
+ ARCH_INIT_USER_COMPAT_FP_FRAME
+};
+
static inline bool fp_state(struct unwind_user_state *state)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP) &&
state->type == UNWIND_USER_TYPE_FP;
}
+static inline bool compat_state(struct unwind_user_state *state)
Consistency would mandate this thing be called: compat_fp_state().
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_COMPAT_FP) &&
+ state->type == UNWIND_USER_TYPE_COMPAT_FP;
+}
+
+#define UNWIND_GET_USER_LONG(to, from, state) \
Do we have to shout this?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+({ \
+ int __ret; \
+ if (compat_state(state)) \
+ __ret = get_user(to, (u32 __user *)(from)); \
+ else \
+ __ret = get_user(to, (unsigned long __user *)(from)); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
int unwind_user_next(struct unwind_user_state *state)
{
struct unwind_user_frame *frame;