Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2025-06-11

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix gss seqno handling to be more rfc-compliant

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Date: 2025-06-11 18:54:37
Also in: linux-nfs, lkml, netdev

On 6/11/25 2:50 PM, Nikhil Jha wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:16:15AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
quoted
On 3/19/25 1:02 PM, Nikhil Jha via B4 Relay wrote:
quoted
When the client retransmits an operation (for example, because the
server is slow to respond), a new GSS sequence number is associated with
the XID. In the current kernel code the original sequence number is
discarded. Subsequently, if a response to the original request is
received there will be a GSS sequence number mismatch. A mismatch will
trigger another retransmit, possibly repeating the cycle, and after some
number of failed retries EACCES is returned.

RFC2203, section 5.3.3.1 suggests a possible solution... “cache the
RPCSEC_GSS sequence number of each request it sends” and "compute the
checksum of each sequence number in the cache to try to match the
checksum in the reply's verifier." This is what FreeBSD’s implementation
does (rpc_gss_validate in sys/rpc/rpcsec_gss/rpcsec_gss.c).

However, even with this cache, retransmits directly caused by a seqno
mismatch can still cause a bad message interleaving that results in this
bug. The RFC already suggests ignoring incorrect seqnos on the server
side, and this seems symmetric, so this patchset also applies that
behavior to the client.

These two patches are *not* dependent on each other. I tested them by
delaying packets with a Python script hooked up to NFQUEUE. If it would
be helpful I can send this script along as well.

Signed-off-by: Nikhil Jha <redacted>
---
Changes since v1:
 * Maintain the invariant that the first seqno is always first in
   rq_seqnos, so that it doesn't need to be stored twice.
 * Minor formatting, and resending with proper mailing-list headers so the
   patches are easier to work with.

---
Nikhil Jha (2):
      sunrpc: implement rfc2203 rpcsec_gss seqnum cache
      sunrpc: don't immediately retransmit on seqno miss

 include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h    | 17 +++++++++++-
 include/trace/events/rpcgss.h  |  4 +--
 include/trace/events/sunrpc.h  |  2 +-
 net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 net/sunrpc/clnt.c              |  9 +++++--
 net/sunrpc/xprt.c              |  3 ++-
 6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6
change-id: 20250314-rfc2203-seqnum-cache-52389d14f567

Best regards,
This seems like a sensible thing to do to me.

Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

-- 
Chuck Lever
Hi,

We've been running this patch for a while now and noticed a (very silly
in hindsight) bug.

maj_stat = gss_validate_seqno_mic(ctx, task->tk_rqstp->rq_seqnos[i], seq, p, len);

needs to be

maj_stat = gss_validate_seqno_mic(ctx, task->tk_rqstp->rq_seqnos[i++], seq, p, len);

Or the kernel gets stuck in a loop when you have more than two retries.
I can resend this patch but I noticed it's already made its way into
quite a few trees. Should this be a separate patch instead?
The course of action depends on what trees you found the patch in.


-- 
Chuck Lever
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help