Re: [PATCH v4 01/24] ring-buffer: Introduce ring-buffer remotes
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2025-05-08 14:05:12
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2025-05-08 14:05:12
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Thu, 8 May 2025 10:10:40 +0100 Vincent Donnefort [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hmm, I wonder if this would be worth adding to the user interface?Would trace-cmd have any use for those fields? That said, even if it does not at the moment, it would mean the meta-page has a single version between kern/user-space and hyp/kern which is probably better?
I was thinking that it's better to have the consistency than user space using it. I'm not sure how much overhead it has for the normal buffer to update those fields. -- Steve