On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:02:47PM +0100, Vasily Gorbik wrote:

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 02:41:59PM +0100, Joel Granados wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:26:20PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:29:46PM +0100, joel granados wrote:

quoted

Move s390 sysctls (spin_retry and userprocess_debug) into their own
files under arch/s390. We create two new sysctl tables
(2390_{fault,spin}_sysctl_table) which will be initialized with
arch_initcall placing them after their original place in proc_root_init.

This is part of a greater effort to move ctl tables into their
respective subsystems which will reduce the merge conflicts in
kernel/sysctl.c.

Signed-off-by: joel granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>
---
 arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/s390/mm/fault.c     | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sysctl.c          | 18 ------------------
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>

How should this go upstream? Will you take care of this, or should
this go via the s390 tree?

thx for the review

It would be great if you can push it through the s390 tree. However, if
it is not possible to do so, please let me know and I'll add it to the
sysctl-next changes.

I've slightly changed the commit message
s390: Move s390 sysctls into their own file under arch/s390

And applied, thank you!

ok. I'll remove it from my future versions.
Thx

-- 

Joel Granados