It's unclear why they would be considered migration entries; they are
not.

Likely we'll never really trigger that case in practice, because
migration (including folio split) of a folio that has device-exclusive
entries is never started, as we would detect "additional references":
device-exclusive entries adjust the mapcount, but not the refcount.

Fixes: b756a3b5e7ea ("mm: device exclusive memory access")
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
---
 mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
index 81839a9e74f16..32679be22d30c 100644
--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
+++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c

@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ static bool check_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
 			return false;
 		entry = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
 
-		if (!is_migration_entry(entry) &&
-		    !is_device_exclusive_entry(entry))
+		if (!is_migration_entry(entry))
 			return false;
 
 		pfn = swp_offset_pfn(entry);

-- 
2.48.1