Thread (161 messages) 161 messages, 8 authors, 2025-04-24

Re: [PATCH v4 30/39] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-01-22 22:49:05
Also in: linux-perf-users, linux-toolchains, lkml

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 03:15:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 06:31:22PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Oh gawd. Can we please do something simple like:

	guard(irqsave)();
	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
	ctr = __this_cpu_read(unwind_ctx_cnt);
Don't you need a compiler barrier here?  __this_cpu_read() doesn't have
one.
	cookie = READ_ONCE(current->unwind_info.cookie);
	do {
		if (cookie)
			return cookie;
		cookie = ctx_to_cookie(cpu, ctr+1);
	} while (!try_cmpxchg64(&current->unwind_info.cookie, &cookie, cookie));
	__this_cpu_write(unwind_ctx_ctr, ctr+1);
	return cookie;
I was trying to avoid the overhead of the cmpxchg.

But also, the nmi_cookie is still needed for the case where the NMI
arrives before info->cookie gets cleared by early entry-from-user.

-- 
Josh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help