Re: [PATCH] seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2025-01-21 16:16:31
Also in:
bpf, linux-api, lkml, stable
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2025-01-21 16:16:31
Also in:
bpf, linux-api, lkml, stable
[ Watching this with popcorn from the sidelines, but I'll chime in anyway ] On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:38:48 +0100 Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:
I'm still trying to come up with some other solution but wanted to exhaust all the options I could think of
I think this may have been mentioned, but is there a way that the kernel could know that this system call is being monitored by seccomp, and if so, just stick with the interrupt version? If not, enable the system call? -- Steve