Re: [PATCH v2] kernel: add pid_max to pid_namespace
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Date: 2024-11-21 14:34:02
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Date: 2024-11-21 14:34:02
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:06:27AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 11:10:24AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:quoted
It is necessary to have a different pid_max in different containers. For example, multiple containers are running on a host, one of which is Android, and its 32 bit bionic libc only accepts pid <= 65535. So it requires the global pid_max <= 65535. This will cause configuration conflicts with other containers and also limit the maximum number of tasks for the entire system. Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <redacted> ---Fwiw, I've done a patch like this years ago and then Alex revived it in [1] including selftests! There's downsides to consider: [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240222160915.315255-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com (local)
Thanks, looks like this patch has the same oddity. For me it's enough to just walk up the tree when changing pid_max. It seems unlikely that applications will create a sub pidns and then lower the max in their own pid_max. Famous last words and all that. Tycho