Re: The state of uprobes work and logistics
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2024-11-06 10:46:49
Also in:
bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-perf-users, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2024-11-06 10:46:49
Also in:
bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-perf-users, lkml
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:11:07PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:42 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: SNIPquoted
- Jiri Olsa's uprobe "session" support ([5]). This is less performance focused, but important functionality by itself. But I'm calling this out here because the first two patches are pure uprobe internal changes, and I believe they should go into tip/perf/core to avoid conflicts with the rest of pending uprobe changes. Peter, do you mind applying those two and creating a stable tag for bpf-next to pull? We'll apply the rest of Jiri's series to bpf-next/master.Hi Ingo, there's uprobe session support change that already landed in tip tree, but we have bpf related changes that need to go in through bpf-next tree could you please create the stable tag that we could pull to bpf-next/master and apply the rest of the uprobe session changes in there?Ping. We (BPF) are blocked on this, we can't apply Jiri's uprobe session series ([0]), until we merge two of his patches that landed into perf/core. Can we please get a stable tag which we can use to pull perf/core's patches into bpf-next/master?
The whole tip/perf/core should be stable, but let me try and figure out how git tags work.. might as well read a man-page today.