Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2024-11-06

Re: The state of uprobes work and logistics

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2024-11-06 10:46:49
Also in: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-perf-users, lkml

On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:11:07PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:42 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

SNIP
quoted
  - Jiri Olsa's uprobe "session" support ([5]). This is less
performance focused, but important functionality by itself. But I'm
calling this out here because the first two patches are pure uprobe
internal changes, and I believe they should go into tip/perf/core to
avoid conflicts with the rest of pending uprobe changes.

Peter, do you mind applying those two and creating a stable tag for
bpf-next to pull? We'll apply the rest of Jiri's series to
bpf-next/master.

Hi Ingo,
there's uprobe session support change that already landed in tip tree,
but we have bpf related changes that need to go in through bpf-next tree

could you please create the stable tag that we could pull to bpf-next/master
and apply the rest of the uprobe session changes in there?
Ping. We (BPF) are blocked on this, we can't apply Jiri's uprobe
session series ([0]), until we merge two of his patches that landed
into perf/core. Can we please get a stable tag which we can use to
pull perf/core's patches into bpf-next/master?
The whole tip/perf/core should be stable, but let me try and figure out
how git tags work.. might as well read a man-page today.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help