Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2024-10-21

Re: [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 1/2] uprobes: allow put_uprobe() from non-sleepable softirq context

From: Andrii Nakryiko <hidden>
Date: 2024-10-18 18:22:15
Also in: bpf, lkml

On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 1:26 AM Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 05:25:55PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
quoted
Currently put_uprobe() might trigger mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock(), which
makes it unsuitable to be called from more restricted context like softirq.
This is delayed_uprobe_lock, right?
Not just delated_uprobe_lock, there is also uprobes_treelock (I forgot
to update the commit message to mention that). Oleg had concerns (see
[0]) with that being taken from the timer thread, so I just moved all
of the locking into deferred work callback.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240915144910.GA27726@redhat.com/ (local)
So can't we do something like so instead?
I'll need to look at this more thoroughly (and hopefully Oleg will get
a chance as well), dropping lock from delayed_ref_ctr_inc() is a bit
scary, but might be ok.

But generally speaking, what's your concern with doing deferred work
in put_uprobe()? It's not a hot path by any means, worst case we'll
have maybe thousands of uprobes attached/detached.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 2a0059464383..d17a9046de35 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -83,9 +83,11 @@ struct delayed_uprobe {
        struct list_head list;
        struct uprobe *uprobe;
        struct mm_struct *mm;
+       struct rcu_head rcu;
 };

-static DEFINE_MUTEX(delayed_uprobe_lock);
+/* XXX global state; use per mm list instead ? */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(delayed_uprobe_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(delayed_uprobe_list);

 /*
@@ -289,9 +291,11 @@ delayed_uprobe_check(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
        struct delayed_uprobe *du;

-       list_for_each_entry(du, &delayed_uprobe_list, list)
+       guard(rcu)();
+       list_for_each_entry_rcu(du, &delayed_uprobe_list, list) {
                if (du->uprobe == uprobe && du->mm == mm)
                        return du;
+       }
        return NULL;
 }
@@ -308,7 +312,8 @@ static int delayed_uprobe_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm)

        du->uprobe = uprobe;
        du->mm = mm;
-       list_add(&du->list, &delayed_uprobe_list);
+       scoped_guard(spinlock, &delayed_uprobe_lock)
+               list_add_rcu(&du->list, &delayed_uprobe_list);
        return 0;
 }
@@ -316,19 +321,21 @@ static void delayed_uprobe_delete(struct delayed_uprobe *du)
 {
        if (WARN_ON(!du))
                return;
-       list_del(&du->list);
-       kfree(du);
+       scoped_guard(spinlock, &delayed_uprobe_lock)
+               list_del(&du->list);
+       kfree_rcu(du, rcu);
 }

 static void delayed_uprobe_remove(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-       struct list_head *pos, *q;
        struct delayed_uprobe *du;
+       struct list_head *pos;

        if (!uprobe && !mm)
                return;

-       list_for_each_safe(pos, q, &delayed_uprobe_list) {
+       guard(rcu)();
+       list_for_each_rcu(pos, &delayed_uprobe_list) {
                du = list_entry(pos, struct delayed_uprobe, list);

                if (uprobe && du->uprobe != uprobe)
@@ -434,12 +441,10 @@ static int update_ref_ctr(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
                        return ret;
        }

-       mutex_lock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
        if (d > 0)
                ret = delayed_uprobe_add(uprobe, mm);
        else
                delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, mm);
-       mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);

        return ret;
 }
@@ -645,9 +650,7 @@ static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
         * gets called, we don't get a chance to remove uprobe from
         * delayed_uprobe_list from remove_breakpoint(). Do it here.
         */
-       mutex_lock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
        delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, NULL);
-       mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);

        call_rcu_tasks_trace(&uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_rcu);
 }
@@ -1350,13 +1353,18 @@ static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode,
 /* @vma contains reference counter, not the probed instruction. */
 static int delayed_ref_ctr_inc(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
-       struct list_head *pos, *q;
        struct delayed_uprobe *du;
+       struct list_head *pos;
        unsigned long vaddr;
        int ret = 0, err = 0;

-       mutex_lock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
-       list_for_each_safe(pos, q, &delayed_uprobe_list) {
+       /*
+        * delayed_uprobe_list is added to when the ref_ctr is not mapped
+        * and is consulted (this function) when adding maps. And since
+        * mmap_lock serializes these, it is not possible miss an entry.
+        */
+       guard(rcu)();
+       list_for_each_rcu(pos, &delayed_uprobe_list) {
                du = list_entry(pos, struct delayed_uprobe, list);

                if (du->mm != vma->vm_mm ||
@@ -1370,9 +1378,9 @@ static int delayed_ref_ctr_inc(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
                        if (!err)
                                err = ret;
                }
+
                delayed_uprobe_delete(du);
        }
-       mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
        return err;
 }
@@ -1596,9 +1604,7 @@ void uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
        struct xol_area *area = mm->uprobes_state.xol_area;

-       mutex_lock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
        delayed_uprobe_remove(NULL, mm);
-       mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);

        if (!area)
                return;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help