Re: [bug report] ring-buffer: Limit time with disabled interrupts in rb_check_pages()
flat view
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2024-10-22 10:17:18
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:09:47 +0300 Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello Petr Pavlu,
It's not Petr's fault, but mine.
Commit 1f1c2bc9d075 ("ring-buffer: Limit time with disabled
interrupts in rb_check_pages()") from Jul 15, 2024 (linux-next),
leads to the following Smatch static checker warning: 1531 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
1532 head = rb_list_head(cpu_buffer->pages);
1533 if (!rb_check_links(cpu_buffer, head))
1534 goto out_locked;
1535 buffer_cnt = cpu_buffer->cnt;
1536 tmp = head;
1537 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
1538 return;
^^^^^^
You probably intended to delete this return?He sent two patches where the second patch was a fix to mainline. I asked him to reverse the order so I could send the fix to Linus, in which he did. In the mean time I switched the order myself for testing and broke it with this mistake. When he sent the update I took his patches but accidentally tested and pushed the broken branch to linux-next. When Linus took the fix, Stephen Rothwell reported a bad merge between next and Linus's tree. That's when I realized I had pushed the wrong branch. This is the broken branch. I already updated my for-next branch with the correct commits and when Stephen syncs the linux-next tree, it should be fixed. -- Steve
1539
--> 1540 while (true) {
1541 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
1542
1543 if (buffer_cnt != cpu_buffer->cnt) {
1544 /* The list was updated, try again. */
1545 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
1546 goto again;
1547 }
1548
1549 tmp = rb_list_head(tmp->next);
1550 if (tmp == head)
1551 /* The iteration circled back, all is done. */
1552 goto out_locked;
1553
1554 if (!rb_check_links(cpu_buffer, tmp))
1555 goto out_locked;
1556
1557 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
1558 }
1559
1560 out_locked:
1561 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
1562 }
regards,
dan carpenter