Re: [PATCH v14 05/19] function_graph: Pass ftrace_regs to retfunc
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-09-17 10:08:54
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 04:49:20AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:09:02 +0900 "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Pass ftrace_regs to the fgraph_ops::retfunc(). If ftrace_regs is not available, it passes a NULL instead. User callback function can access some registers (including return address) via this ftrace_regs. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> --- Changes in v8: - Pass ftrace_regs to retfunc, instead of adding retregfunc. Changes in v6: - update to use ftrace_regs_get_return_value() because of reordering patches. Changes in v3: - Update for new multiple fgraph. - Save the return address to instruction pointer in ftrace_regs. --- include/linux/ftrace.h | 3 ++- kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 16 +++++++++++----- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 3 ++- kernel/trace/trace.h | 3 ++- kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 7 ++++--- kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 3 ++- kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 3 ++- kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 3 ++- 8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h index 13987cd63553..e7c41d9988e1 100644 --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h@@ -1069,7 +1069,8 @@ struct fgraph_ops; /* Type of the callback handlers for tracing function graph*/ typedef void (*trace_func_graph_ret_t)(struct ftrace_graph_ret *, - struct fgraph_ops *); /* return */ + struct fgraph_ops *, + struct ftrace_regs *); /* return */ typedef int (*trace_func_graph_ent_t)(struct ftrace_graph_ent *, struct fgraph_ops *, struct ftrace_regs *); /* entry */diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c index 30bebe43607d..6a3e2db16aa4 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c +++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c@@ -297,7 +297,8 @@ static int entry_run(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops *ops, } /* ftrace_graph_return set to this to tell some archs to run function graph */ -static void return_run(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace, struct fgraph_ops *ops) +static void return_run(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace, struct fgraph_ops *ops, + struct ftrace_regs *fregs) { }@@ -491,7 +492,8 @@ int ftrace_graph_entry_stub(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, } static void ftrace_graph_ret_stub(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace, - struct fgraph_ops *gops) + struct fgraph_ops *gops, + struct ftrace_regs *fregs) { }@@ -787,6 +789,9 @@ __ftrace_return_to_handler(struct ftrace_regs *fregs, unsigned long frame_pointe } trace.rettime = trace_clock_local(); + if (fregs) + ftrace_regs_set_instruction_pointer(fregs, ret);
Where does the instruction pointer get used after this? The arm64 'return_to_handler' function doesn't look at it when we return. Will