On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 22:58:54 +0100
Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:22:47PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:

quoted

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Fix to allocate fprobe::entry_data_size buffer with rethook instances.
If fprobe doesn't allocate entry_data_size buffer for each rethook instance,
fprobe entry handler can cause a buffer overrun when storing entry data in
entry handler.

Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <redacted>

Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <redacted>

Thanks for testing!
Let me pick this to probe/fixes.

Thank you,

thanks,
jirka

quoted

Fixes: 4bbd93455659 ("kprobes: kretprobe scalability improvement")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/fprobe.c |   14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
index 6cd2a4e3afb8..9ff018245840 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c

@@ -189,9 +189,6 @@ static int fprobe_init_rethook(struct fprobe *fp, int num)
 {
 	int size;
 
-	if (num <= 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (!fp->exit_handler) {
 		fp->rethook = NULL;
 		return 0;

@@ -199,15 +196,16 @@ static int fprobe_init_rethook(struct fprobe *fp, int num)
 
 	/* Initialize rethook if needed */
 	if (fp->nr_maxactive)
-		size = fp->nr_maxactive;
+		num = fp->nr_maxactive;
 	else
-		size = num * num_possible_cpus() * 2;
-	if (size <= 0)
+		num *= num_possible_cpus() * 2;
+	if (num <= 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	size = sizeof(struct fprobe_rethook_node) + fp->entry_data_size;
+
 	/* Initialize rethook */
-	fp->rethook = rethook_alloc((void *)fp, fprobe_exit_handler,
-				sizeof(struct fprobe_rethook_node), size);
+	fp->rethook = rethook_alloc((void *)fp, fprobe_exit_handler, size, num);
 	if (IS_ERR(fp->rethook))
 		return PTR_ERR(fp->rethook);
 

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]