Re: [PATCH] tracepoints: Use WARN() and not WARN_ON() for warnings
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2024-02-28 18:32:46
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:31:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> There are two WARN_ON*() warnings in tracepoint.h that deal with RCU usage. But when they trigger, especially from using a TRACE_EVENT() macro, the information is not very helpful and is confusing: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at include/trace/events/lock.h:24 lock_acquire+0x2b2/0x2d0 Where the above warning takes you to: TRACE_EVENT(lock_acquire, <<<--- line 24 in lock.h TP_PROTO(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int trylock, int read, int check, struct lockdep_map *next_lock, unsigned long ip), [..] Change the WARN_ON_ONCE() to WARN_ONCE() and add a string that allows someone to search for exactly where the bug happened. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- include/linux/tracepoint.h | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
meaning: tested that it really fires:
[ 1.196008] Running RCU Tasks wait API self tests
[ 1.200227] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1.203899] RCU not watching for tracepoint
[ 1.203899] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at include/trace/events/lock.h:24 lock_acquire+0x2d3/0x300
...
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette