Re: [PATCH v17 2/6] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2024-02-13 22:50:09
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:53:09 -0500 Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:49:41 +0000 Vincent Donnefort [off-list ref] wrote: Did you test with lockdep?quoted
+static int __rb_inc_dec_mapped(struct trace_buffer *buffer, + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, + bool inc) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + lockdep_assert_held(cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);/work/git/linux-trace.git/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c: In function ‘__rb_inc_dec_mapped’: /work/git/linux-trace.git/include/linux/lockdep.h:234:61: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘struct mutex’) 234 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) | ^~ /work/git/linux-trace.git/include/asm-generic/bug.h:123:32: note: in definition of macro ‘WARN_ON’ 123 | int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \ | ^~~~~~~~~ /work/git/linux-trace.git/include/linux/lockdep.h:267:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘lockdep_assert’ 267 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /work/git/linux-trace.git/include/linux/lockdep.h:267:24: note: in expansion of macro ‘lockdep_is_held’ 267 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /work/git/linux-trace.git/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:6167:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘lockdep_assert_held’ 6167 | lockdep_assert_held(cpu_buffer->mapping_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I believe that is supposed to be: lockdep_assert_held(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
If this is the only issue with this series, I may just fix up the patch myself.