Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 7 authors, 2024-01-12

Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/bpf: Update LLVM Phabricator links

From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-01-11 20:20:07
Also in: amd-gfx, bpf, bridge, dri-devel, kvm, linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-crypto, linux-efi, linux-kselftest, linux-media, linux-patches, linux-pm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-security-module, linuxppc-dev, lkml, llvm, netdev

Hi Alexei,

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:00:50PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:40 AM Nathan Chancellor [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Yonghong,

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:05:36PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
quoted
On 1/9/24 2:16 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
quoted
reviews.llvm.org was LLVM's Phabricator instances for code review. It
has been abandoned in favor of GitHub pull requests. While the majority
of links in the kernel sources still work because of the work Fangrui
has done turning the dynamic Phabricator instance into a static archive,
there are some issues with that work, so preemptively convert all the
links in the kernel sources to point to the commit on GitHub.

Most of the commits have the corresponding differential review link in
the commit message itself so there should not be any loss of fidelity in
the relevant information.

Additionally, fix a typo in the xdpwall.c print ("LLMV" -> "LLVM") while
in the area.

Link: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/update-on-github-pull-requests/71540/172
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Ack with one nit below.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
<snip>
quoted
quoted
@@ -304,6 +304,6 @@ from running test_progs will look like:
  .. code-block:: console
-  test_xdpwall:FAIL:Does LLVM have https://reviews.llvm.org/D109073? unexpected error: -4007
+  test_xdpwall:FAIL:Does LLVM have https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea72b0319d7b0f0c2fcf41d121afa5d031b319d5? unexpected error: -4007
-__ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109073
+__ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea72b0319d7b0f0c2fcf41d121afa5d031b319d
To be consistent with other links, could you add the missing last alnum '5' to the above link?
Thanks a lot for catching this and providing an ack. Andrew, could you
squash this update into selftests-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links.patch?
Please send a new patch.
We'd like to take all bpf patches through the bpf tree to avoid conflicts.
Very well, I've sent a standalone v2 on top of bpf-next:

https://lore.kernel.org/20240111-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links-v2-1-9a7ae976bd64@kernel.org/ (local)

Andrew, just drop selftests-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links.patch
altogether in that case, the other two patches are fine to go via -mm I
think.

Cheers,
Nathan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help