Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] ring-buffer: Refactor ring buffer implementation
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2023-12-20 12:52:11
Also in:
lkml
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2023-12-20 12:52:11
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:48:43 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <redacted> In order to introduce sub-buffer size per ring buffer, some internal refactoring is needed. As ring_buffer_print_page_header() will depend on the trace_buffer structure, it is moved after the structure definition. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/20211213094825.61876-2-tz.stoyanov@gmail.comOK, but the title is too generic. Something like "Move ring_buffer_print_page_header() after ring_buffer_iter" will be preferable.
Yeah, I can update the subject. Thanks! -- Steve