Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 3 authors, 2023-12-21

Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] ring-buffer: Refactor ring buffer implementation

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2023-12-20 12:52:11
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:48:43 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <redacted>

In order to introduce sub-buffer size per ring buffer, some internal
refactoring is needed. As ring_buffer_print_page_header() will depend on
the trace_buffer structure, it is moved after the structure definition.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/20211213094825.61876-2-tz.stoyanov@gmail.com
  
OK, but the title is too generic. Something like 
"Move ring_buffer_print_page_header() after ring_buffer_iter"
will be preferable.
Yeah, I can update the subject. Thanks!

-- Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help