Re: [PATCH next] trace/blktrace: fix task hung in blk_trace_ioctl
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2023-12-02 22:08:00
Also in:
linux-block, lkml
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:19:25 +0800 Yu Kuai [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, 在 2023/12/02 17:01, Edward Adam Davis 写道:quoted
The reproducer involves running test programs on multiple processors separately, in order to enter blkdev_ioctl() and ultimately reach blk_trace_ioctl() through two different paths, triggering an AA deadlock. CPU0 CPU1 --- --- mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex) mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex) mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex) mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex) The first path: blkdev_ioctl()-> blk_trace_ioctl()-> mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex) The second path: blkdev_ioctl()-> blkdev_common_ioctl()-> blk_trace_ioctl()-> mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex)I still don't understand how this AA deadlock is triggered, does the 'debugfs_mutex' already held before calling blk_trace_ioctl()?
Right, I don't see where the mutex is taken twice. You don't need two paths for an AA lock, you only need one.
quoted
The solution I have proposed is to exit blk_trace_ioctl() to avoid AA locks if a task has already obtained debugfs_mutex. Fixes: 0d345996e4cb ("x86/kernel: increase kcov coverage under arch/x86/kernel folder")
How does it fix the above? I don't see how the above is even related to this. -- Steve
quoted
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+ed812ed461471ab17a0c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <redacted> --- kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c