On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 02:25:53 +0000
Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:47:03PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

quoted

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Looking at how dentry is removed via the tracefs system, I found that
eventfs does not do everything that it did under tracefs. The tracefs
removal of a dentry calls simple_recursive_removal() that does a lot more
than a simple d_invalidate().  

Umm...  Is there any reason not to use simple_recursive_removal() there?

Hmm, I may be able to (I'm still a newbie with understanding of the vfs).

I did it this way thinking that a dentry may exist in the children but not
at a higher level, but I don't think that can be the case. This creates
dentries and inodes dynamically when they are referenced. The eventfs_inode
maps to each directory (the files of a directory are created from the
information from the eventfs_inode).

My thought process for doing it this way was if a child created a dentry
but the parent did not. But I don't think that can happen, right? So all I
may need to do is to check if the ei->dentry exists for the ei that is
being deleted, and after marking it and all its children as "freed", I can
then call simple_recursive_removal() on the top ei->dentry if it exists, as
that will guarantee to get all the dentries of any of the children that
exist. Right?

-- Steve